Is a Percentage Billing Fee Legal in North Carolina?

North Carolina requires a profession-specific answer. Its Medical Board expressly addresses percentage revenue sharing with nonlicensees. An LCSW, LCMHC, LMFT, or psychologist should also identify the rules of their own licensing board; a medical-board statement should not be presented as a complete legal opinion for every therapist.

What does the North Carolina Medical Board say?

The Board’s fee-splitting position states that, except where law permits, a licensee may not share revenue on a percentage basis with a nonlicensee. It also addresses referral compensation and cites statutory exceptions. A physician or psychiatric practice should treat that position as a direct issue when evaluating an outside billing percentage.

The statement is from the Medical Board. Its scope and the rules of other professions must be identified before applying that conclusion to a different mental-health license.

What should an LCMHC or LCSW check?

The North Carolina counseling board publishes its own practice act, administrative rules, and ethics-code resources. Start with the sources for the actual profession and bring the proposed contract to counsel. The presence of a restriction in one board’s materials does not settle another profession’s entire compensation framework.

For a mixed group, make a list of clinician licenses, the contracting entity, service locations, and the vendor’s functions. Specify whether the vendor performs only claims work or also supplies patients, handles marketing, or manages operations. That gives the reviewer a concrete arrangement to assess.

Could a per-claim fee fit the arrangement better?

A fixed fee for defined administrative work is a structure to evaluate when a revenue share is prohibited. Specify the original claim event and the included follow-up. Avoid an agreement that calls its charge fixed while periodically resetting it to reproduce a share of collections.

Bomi’s current standard agreement uses its restricted-state per-claim clause when the percentage base fee is prohibited. This page does not promise that the same legal conclusion applies to every North Carolina mental-health practice. The proposed agreement should state the arrangement for your services.

How can I compare the cost without losing accountability?

Compare a slow month and an ordinary month using the same scope. A submission-based fee can be due before a payer pays. A collections-based fee, where permissible, moves with eligible receipts. A flat monthly quote can simplify budgeting but may contain workload limits.

Then ask who remains responsible for a denied claim, what the practice must supply, and how unresolved items are handed over if the relationship ends. The answer should be specific under any compensation model.

What should my next question to a biller be?

Ask: “Which fee structure are you proposing for my license and services, and what work continues after the claim is submitted?” Take that answer, the sample invoice, and the contract to North Carolina healthcare counsel. Keep legal permission separate from the business decision about cost and fit.

Educational information only. Primary sources checked October 23, 2026; the article does not determine the legality of a particular contract.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does North Carolina’s Medical Board address percentage revenue sharing?

Yes. Its position restricts percentage revenue sharing with nonlicensees except where permitted by law. Identify whether the professional and arrangement fall within its scope.

Does that statement alone settle an LCMHC billing agreement?

No. Check the counseling board’s governing sources and the actual contract. Do not assume a physician rule is the complete rule for every therapist.

Sources and scope

North Carolina Medical Board: referral fees and fee splitting

North Carolina counseling board: laws and codes

Related questions

Understand the national state-and-license framework

See Bomi’s current pricing or talk through your practice’s billing needs.